On top of it, they also help to teach new members of the team. So what did we learn from this definition? Code Reviews are a great way for teams to keep their software maintainable and also find bugs before they make it into production. In general finding way better solutions to problems.Have just a second pair of eyes watching out for small misalignments which accumulate over time and let your code rot.Creating a sense of mutual responsibility.Learning (by getting code reviewed) and Teaching (by reviewing other’s code).Other goals which are also reached by performing these reviews are: The main goal of Code Reviews is to find quality issues in the reviewed code. The paragraph after this quote is about the goals of Code Reviews. The humans performing the checking, excluding the author, are called “reviewers” At least one of the humans must not be the code’s author. What are Code Reviews? According to Wikipedia, a Code review is defined by the following quote:Ĭode review (sometimes referred to as peer review) is a software quality assurance activity in which one or several humans check a program mainly by viewing and reading parts of its source code, and they do so after implementation or as an interruption of implementation. (licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 2.5 License.)

The Basics An webcomic how code of a self-taught developer may get reviewed. What are the obligations of each participant? What are well known Code Review Best Practices? But before we start talking about Principles of Code Reviews or which Code Review Best Practices there are – start slow and talk about the basics. If you spent some time to talk with people about Code Reviews, everybody has its own opinion on what a good Code Review should include or how to do Code Reviews. Everybody knows what a Code Review is, everybody does them (at least I hope you all do).

A review about coda software